All ICPC entries
Competitive Programming

ICPC 2017 - E. Need for Speed

State the problem in your own words. Focus on the mathematical or algorithmic core rather than repeating the full statement.

Source sync Apr 19, 2026
Track ICPC
Year 2017
Files TeX, C++, statement assets
Folder competitive_programming/icpc/2017/E-need-for-speed
ICPC2017TeXC++statement textstatement pdf

Source-first archive entry

This page is built from the copied files in competitive_programming/icpc/2017/E-need-for-speed. Edit competitive_programming/icpc/2017/E-need-for-speed/solution.tex to update the written solution and competitive_programming/icpc/2017/E-need-for-speed/solution.cpp to update the implementation.

The website does not replace those files with hand-maintained HTML. It reads the copied source tree during the build and exposes the exact files below.

Problem Statement

Copied statement text kept beside the solution archive for direct reference.

Rapid City

                                                                                  event
                                                                                  sponsor
                                                                                                  ICPC 2017

                                              Problem E
                                           Need for Speed
                                         Time limit: 1 second
Sheila is a student and she drives a typical student car: it is old, slow,
rusty, and falling apart. Recently, the needle on the speedometer fell
off. She glued it back on, but she might have placed it at the wrong
angle. Thus, when the speedometer reads s, her true speed is s + c,
where c is an unknown constant (possibly negative).
Sheila made a careful record of a recent journey and wants to use
this to compute c. The journey consisted of n segments. In the ith
segment she traveled a distance of di and the speedometer read si for
the entire segment. This whole journey took time t. Help Sheila by
computing c.
Note that while Sheila’s speedometer might have negative readings,
her true speed was greater than zero for each segment of the journey.

Input

The first line of input contains two integers n (1 ≤ n ≤ 1 000), the number of sections in Sheila’s journey,
and t (1 ≤ t ≤ 106 ), the total time. This is followed by n lines, each describing one segment of Sheila’s
journey. The ith of these lines contains two integers di (1 ≤ di ≤ 1 000) and si (|si | ≤ 1 000), the distance
and speedometer reading for the ith segment of the journey. Time is specified in hours, distance in miles,
and speed in miles per hour.

Output

Display the constant c in miles per hour. Your answer should have an absolute or relative error of less than
10−6 .

 Sample Input 1                                            Sample Output 1
 3 5                                                       3.000000000
 4 -1
 4 0
 10 3

 Sample Input 2                                            Sample Output 2
 4   10                                                    -0.508653377
 5   3
 2   2
 3   6
 3   1

This page is intentionally left blank.

Editorial

Rendered from the copied solution.tex file. The original TeX source remains available below.

Key Observations

  • Write the structural observations that make the problem tractable.

  • State any useful invariant, monotonicity property, graph interpretation, or combinatorial reformulation.

  • If the constraints matter, explain exactly which part of the solution they enable.

Algorithm

  1. Describe the data structures and the state maintained by the algorithm.

  2. Explain the processing order and why it is sufficient.

  3. Mention corner cases explicitly if they affect the implementation.

Correctness Proof

We prove that the algorithm returns the correct answer.

Lemma 1.

State the first key claim.

Proof.

Provide a concise proof.

Lemma 2.

State the next claim if needed.

Proof.

Provide a concise proof.

Theorem.

The algorithm outputs the correct answer for every valid input.

Proof.

Combine the lemmas and finish the argument.

Complexity Analysis

State the running time and memory usage in terms of the input size.

Implementation Notes

  • Mention any non-obvious implementation detail that is easy to get wrong.

  • Mention numeric limits, indexing conventions, or tie-breaking rules if relevant.

Code

Exact copied C++ implementation from solution.cpp.

C++ competitive_programming/icpc/2017/E-need-for-speed/solution.cpp

Exact copied implementation source.

Raw file
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;

namespace {

void solve() {
    // Fill in the full solution logic for the problem here.
}

}  // namespace

int main() {
    ios::sync_with_stdio(false);
    cin.tie(nullptr);

    solve();
    return 0;
}

Source Files

Exact copied source-of-truth files. Edit solution.tex for the write-up and solution.cpp for the implementation.

TeX write-up competitive_programming/icpc/2017/E-need-for-speed/solution.tex

Exact copied write-up source.

Raw file
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm}
\usepackage{enumitem}

\title{ICPC World Finals 2017\\E. Need for Speed}
\author{}
\date{}

\begin{document}
\maketitle

\section*{Problem Summary}

State the problem in your own words. Focus on the mathematical or algorithmic core rather than repeating the full statement.

\section*{Key Observations}

\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*]
    \item Write the structural observations that make the problem tractable.
    \item State any useful invariant, monotonicity property, graph interpretation, or combinatorial reformulation.
    \item If the constraints matter, explain exactly which part of the solution they enable.
\end{itemize}

\section*{Algorithm}

\begin{enumerate}[leftmargin=*]
    \item Describe the data structures and the state maintained by the algorithm.
    \item Explain the processing order and why it is sufficient.
    \item Mention corner cases explicitly if they affect the implementation.
\end{enumerate}

\section*{Correctness Proof}

We prove that the algorithm returns the correct answer.

\paragraph{Lemma 1.}
State the first key claim.

\paragraph{Proof.}
Provide a concise proof.

\paragraph{Lemma 2.}
State the next claim if needed.

\paragraph{Proof.}
Provide a concise proof.

\paragraph{Theorem.}
The algorithm outputs the correct answer for every valid input.

\paragraph{Proof.}
Combine the lemmas and finish the argument.

\section*{Complexity Analysis}

State the running time and memory usage in terms of the input size.

\section*{Implementation Notes}

\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*]
    \item Mention any non-obvious implementation detail that is easy to get wrong.
    \item Mention numeric limits, indexing conventions, or tie-breaking rules if relevant.
\end{itemize}

\end{document}