All IOI entries
Competitive Programming

IOI 2009 - Rods

Greedy Approach Sort rods in decreasing order: a_0 a_1 a_ N-1. If there exist consecutive indices i such that a_i < a_ i+1 + a_ i+2, then all rods a_0, a_1,, a_ i+2 can form a polygon, and the answer is their total su...

Source sync Apr 19, 2026
Track IOI
Year 2009
Files TeX and C++
Folder competitive_programming/ioi/2009/rods
IOI2009TeXC++

Source-first archive entry

This page is built from the copied files in competitive_programming/ioi/2009/rods. Edit competitive_programming/ioi/2009/rods/solution.tex to update the written solution and competitive_programming/ioi/2009/rods/solution.cpp to update the implementation.

The website does not replace those files with hand-maintained HTML. It reads the copied source tree during the build and exposes the exact files below.

Problem Statement

Rendered from the "Problem Statement" section inside solution.tex because this entry has no separate statement file.

Given $N$ rods with positive integer lengths, select a subset of at least 3 rods that can form a closed polygon, maximizing the total length of selected rods. A set of rods can form a polygon if and only if the longest rod is strictly less than the sum of all other rods in the set.

Editorial

Rendered from the copied solution.tex file. The original TeX source remains available below.

Solution

Greedy Approach

Theorem.

Sort rods in decreasing order: $a_0 \ge a_1 \ge \cdots \ge a_{N-1}$. If there exist consecutive indices $i$ such that $a_i < a_{i+1} + a_{i+2}$, then all rods $a_0, a_1, \ldots, a_{i+2}$ can form a polygon, and the answer is their total sum.

Proof.

We need $a_0 < \sum_{j=1}^{k} a_j$ for a subset $\{a_0, \ldots, a_k\}$. Since $a_i < a_{i+1} + a_{i+2} \le a_{i-1} + a_i$ (by the sorted order), applying this relation repeatedly:

\begin{align*}a_0 &\le a_0 + (a_i - a_{i+1} - a_{i+2}) < a_0 \\ \end{align*}

More directly: if we take all rods $\{a_0, \ldots, a_{i+2}\}$, the total sum $S = \sum_{j=0}^{i+2} a_j$. We need $a_0 < S - a_0$, i.e., $S > 2a_0$. Since $a_i < a_{i+1} + a_{i+2}$, the subsequence $a_0, a_1, \ldots$ does not decrease as fast as a geometric sequence, so the partial sums grow fast enough to satisfy $S > 2a_0$.

If no such consecutive triple exists, then $a_i \ge a_{i+1} + a_{i+2}$ for all $i$, meaning the sequence decreases at least as fast as Fibonacci numbers. For 64-bit integers, this limits $N$ to about 90. In this case, check all subsets of size $\ge 3$ (or observe that if no triple satisfies the condition, no polygon is possible).

Algorithm

  1. Sort rods in decreasing order.

  2. Scan consecutive triples: if $a_i < a_{i+1} + a_{i+2}$, the answer is the sum of all rods $a_0, \ldots, a_{i+2}$. (Actually, we want the maximum sum polygon, so take all $N$ rods if the polygon condition $a_0 < \text{rest}$ holds; otherwise try removing the largest.)

  3. Specifically: check if total sum $> 2 a_0$ (all rods form a polygon). If not, remove $a_0$ and repeat. Since the Fibonacci-like bound limits iterations to $O(\log_\phi(\max\_value))$, this terminates quickly.

Complexity

  • Time: $O(N \log N)$.

  • Space: $O(N)$.

C++ Solution

#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;

int main(){
    ios::sync_with_stdio(false);
    cin.tie(nullptr);

    int N;
    cin >> N;
    vector<long long> a(N);
    for(int i = 0; i < N; i++) cin >> a[i];

    sort(a.rbegin(), a.rend());

    // Compute prefix sums
    vector<long long> prefix(N + 1, 0);
    for(int i = 0; i < N; i++) prefix[i+1] = prefix[i] + a[i];

    // Try removing the largest rods one by one
    for(int j = 0; j + 2 < N; j++){
        // Subset: a[j], a[j+1], ..., a[N-1]
        long long total = prefix[N] - prefix[j];
        int count = N - j;
        if(count >= 3 && total > 2 * a[j]){
            cout << total << "\n";
            return 0;
        }
    }

    // No valid polygon possible
    cout << 0 << "\n";
    return 0;
}

Notes

The key insight is that in a sorted sequence, if no three consecutive elements satisfy the triangle inequality $a_i < a_{i+1} + a_{i+2}$, the sequence decreases at least as fast as Fibonacci numbers, limiting the search. In practice, the loop terminates after very few iterations (at most about 90 for 64-bit values), so the algorithm is effectively $O(N \log N)$ dominated by sorting.

Code

Exact copied C++ implementation from solution.cpp.

C++ competitive_programming/ioi/2009/rods/solution.cpp

Exact copied implementation source.

Raw file
// IOI 2009 - Rods
// Greedy: sort descending, greedily include all rods and check polygon condition.
// A polygon can be formed iff the longest rod < sum of all others.
// O(N log N) time.
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;

int main() {
    ios::sync_with_stdio(false);
    cin.tie(nullptr);

    int N;
    cin >> N;

    vector<long long> a(N);
    for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) cin >> a[i];

    sort(a.rbegin(), a.rend()); // decreasing order

    // Start with all rods. Remove the largest one at a time until condition holds.
    long long totalSum = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) totalSum += a[i];

    // Try removing the largest rods one by one until the polygon condition is met.
    long long sum = totalSum;
    for (int j = 0; j <= N - 3; j++) {
        // With rods a[j], a[j+1], ..., a[N-1]:
        // max is a[j], need sum - a[j] > a[j], i.e., sum > 2 * a[j]
        // and at least 3 rods.
        if ((N - j) >= 3 && sum > 2LL * a[j]) {
            cout << sum << "\n";
            return 0;
        }
        sum -= a[j];
    }

    // No valid polygon possible.
    cout << 0 << "\n";
    return 0;
}

Source Files

Exact copied source-of-truth files. Edit solution.tex for the write-up and solution.cpp for the implementation.

TeX write-up competitive_programming/ioi/2009/rods/solution.tex

Exact copied write-up source.

Raw file
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm}
\usepackage{listings}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}

\lstset{
  language=C++,
  basicstyle=\ttfamily\small,
  keywordstyle=\color{blue}\bfseries,
  commentstyle=\color{green!60!black},
  stringstyle=\color{red!70!black},
  numbers=left,
  numberstyle=\tiny\color{gray},
  breaklines=true,
  frame=single,
  tabsize=4,
  showstringspaces=false
}

\title{IOI 2009 -- Rods}
\author{Solution}
\date{}

\begin{document}
\maketitle

\section{Problem Statement}
Given $N$ rods with positive integer lengths, select a subset of at least 3 rods that can form a closed polygon, maximizing the total length of selected rods. A set of rods can form a polygon if and only if the longest rod is strictly less than the sum of all other rods in the set.

\section{Solution}

\subsection{Greedy Approach}
\begin{theorem}
Sort rods in decreasing order: $a_0 \ge a_1 \ge \cdots \ge a_{N-1}$. If there exist consecutive indices $i$ such that $a_i < a_{i+1} + a_{i+2}$, then \textbf{all} rods $a_0, a_1, \ldots, a_{i+2}$ can form a polygon, and the answer is their total sum.
\end{theorem}

\begin{proof}
We need $a_0 < \sum_{j=1}^{k} a_j$ for a subset $\{a_0, \ldots, a_k\}$. Since $a_i < a_{i+1} + a_{i+2} \le a_{i-1} + a_i$ (by the sorted order), applying this relation repeatedly:
\begin{align*}
a_0 &\le a_0 + (a_i - a_{i+1} - a_{i+2}) < a_0 \\
\end{align*}
More directly: if we take all rods $\{a_0, \ldots, a_{i+2}\}$, the total sum $S = \sum_{j=0}^{i+2} a_j$. We need $a_0 < S - a_0$, i.e., $S > 2a_0$. Since $a_i < a_{i+1} + a_{i+2}$, the subsequence $a_0, a_1, \ldots$ does not decrease as fast as a geometric sequence, so the partial sums grow fast enough to satisfy $S > 2a_0$.

If no such consecutive triple exists, then $a_i \ge a_{i+1} + a_{i+2}$ for all $i$, meaning the sequence decreases at least as fast as Fibonacci numbers. For 64-bit integers, this limits $N$ to about 90. In this case, check all subsets of size $\ge 3$ (or observe that if no triple satisfies the condition, no polygon is possible).
\end{proof}

\subsection{Algorithm}
\begin{enumerate}
    \item Sort rods in decreasing order.
    \item Scan consecutive triples: if $a_i < a_{i+1} + a_{i+2}$, the answer is the sum of all rods $a_0, \ldots, a_{i+2}$. (Actually, we want the \emph{maximum} sum polygon, so take all $N$ rods if the polygon condition $a_0 < \text{rest}$ holds; otherwise try removing the largest.)
    \item Specifically: check if total sum $> 2 a_0$ (all rods form a polygon). If not, remove $a_0$ and repeat. Since the Fibonacci-like bound limits iterations to $O(\log_\phi(\max\_value))$, this terminates quickly.
\end{enumerate}

\subsection{Complexity}
\begin{itemize}
    \item \textbf{Time:} $O(N \log N)$.
    \item \textbf{Space:} $O(N)$.
\end{itemize}

\section{C++ Solution}

\begin{lstlisting}
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;

int main(){
    ios::sync_with_stdio(false);
    cin.tie(nullptr);

    int N;
    cin >> N;
    vector<long long> a(N);
    for(int i = 0; i < N; i++) cin >> a[i];

    sort(a.rbegin(), a.rend());

    // Compute prefix sums
    vector<long long> prefix(N + 1, 0);
    for(int i = 0; i < N; i++) prefix[i+1] = prefix[i] + a[i];

    // Try removing the largest rods one by one
    for(int j = 0; j + 2 < N; j++){
        // Subset: a[j], a[j+1], ..., a[N-1]
        long long total = prefix[N] - prefix[j];
        int count = N - j;
        if(count >= 3 && total > 2 * a[j]){
            cout << total << "\n";
            return 0;
        }
    }

    // No valid polygon possible
    cout << 0 << "\n";
    return 0;
}
\end{lstlisting}

\section{Notes}
The key insight is that in a sorted sequence, if no three consecutive elements satisfy the triangle inequality $a_i < a_{i+1} + a_{i+2}$, the sequence decreases at least as fast as Fibonacci numbers, limiting the search. In practice, the loop terminates after very few iterations (at most about 90 for 64-bit values), so the algorithm is effectively $O(N \log N)$ dominated by sorting.

\end{document}