All ICPC entries
Competitive Programming

ICPC 2018 - I. Triangles

State the problem in your own words. Focus on the mathematical or algorithmic core rather than repeating the full statement.

Source sync Apr 19, 2026
Track ICPC
Year 2018
Files TeX, C++, statement assets
Folder competitive_programming/icpc/2018/I-triangles
ICPC2018TeXC++statement textstatement pdf

Source-first archive entry

This page is built from the copied files in competitive_programming/icpc/2018/I-triangles. Edit competitive_programming/icpc/2018/I-triangles/solution.tex to update the written solution and competitive_programming/icpc/2018/I-triangles/solution.cpp to update the implementation.

The website does not replace those files with hand-maintained HTML. It reads the copied source tree during the build and exposes the exact files below.

Problem Statement

Copied statement text kept beside the solution archive for direct reference.

Problem I
                                              Triangles
                                     Time limit: 6 seconds
For your trip to Beijing, you have brought plenty of puzzle books, many of them containing challenges
like the following: how many triangles can be found in Figure I.1?

                                Figure I.1: Illustration of Sample Input 2.

While these puzzles keep your interest for a while, you quickly get bored with them and instead start
thinking about how you might solve them algorithmically. Who knows, maybe a problem like that will
actually be used in this year’s contest. Well, guess what? Today is your lucky day!

Input

The first line of input contains two integers r and c (1 ≤ r ≤ 3 000, 1 ≤ c ≤ 6 000), specifying the
picture size, where r is the number of rows of vertices and c is the number of columns. Following this are
2r − 1 lines, each of them having at most 2c − 1 characters. Odd lines contain grid vertices (represented
as lowercase x characters) and zero or more horizontal edges, while even lines contain zero or more
diagonal edges. Specifically, picture lines with numbers 4k + 1 have vertices in positions 1, 5, 9, 13, . . .
while lines with numbers 4k + 3 have vertices in positions 3, 7, 11, 15, . . . . All possible vertices are
represented in the input (for example, see how Figure I.1 is represented in Sample Input 2). Horizontal
edges connecting neighboring vertices are represented by three dashes. Diagonal edges are represented
by a single forward slash (‘/’) or backslash (‘\’) character. The edge characters will be placed exactly
between the corresponding vertices. All other characters will be space characters. Note that if any input
line could contain trailing whitespace, that whitespace may be omitted.

Output

Display the number of triangles (of any size) formed by grid edges in the input picture.

 Sample Input 1                                        Sample Output 1
 3 3                                                   1
 x---x
  \ /
   x
  / \
 x    x

Sample Input 2                                    Sample Output 2
4 10                                              12
x    x---x---x     x
      \ /   / \
  x    x---x    x    x
      / \ / \    \
x    x---x---x---x
   /    / \   \ / \
  x---x---x---x---x

Editorial

Rendered from the copied solution.tex file. The original TeX source remains available below.

Key Observations

  • Write the structural observations that make the problem tractable.

  • State any useful invariant, monotonicity property, graph interpretation, or combinatorial reformulation.

  • If the constraints matter, explain exactly which part of the solution they enable.

Algorithm

  1. Describe the data structures and the state maintained by the algorithm.

  2. Explain the processing order and why it is sufficient.

  3. Mention corner cases explicitly if they affect the implementation.

Correctness Proof

We prove that the algorithm returns the correct answer.

Lemma 1.

State the first key claim.

Proof.

Provide a concise proof.

Lemma 2.

State the next claim if needed.

Proof.

Provide a concise proof.

Theorem.

The algorithm outputs the correct answer for every valid input.

Proof.

Combine the lemmas and finish the argument.

Complexity Analysis

State the running time and memory usage in terms of the input size.

Implementation Notes

  • Mention any non-obvious implementation detail that is easy to get wrong.

  • Mention numeric limits, indexing conventions, or tie-breaking rules if relevant.

Code

Exact copied C++ implementation from solution.cpp.

C++ competitive_programming/icpc/2018/I-triangles/solution.cpp

Exact copied implementation source.

Raw file
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;

namespace {

void solve() {
    // Fill in the full solution logic for the problem here.
}

}  // namespace

int main() {
    ios::sync_with_stdio(false);
    cin.tie(nullptr);

    solve();
    return 0;
}

Source Files

Exact copied source-of-truth files. Edit solution.tex for the write-up and solution.cpp for the implementation.

TeX write-up competitive_programming/icpc/2018/I-triangles/solution.tex

Exact copied write-up source.

Raw file
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm}
\usepackage{enumitem}

\title{ICPC World Finals 2018\\I. Triangles}
\author{}
\date{}

\begin{document}
\maketitle

\section*{Problem Summary}

State the problem in your own words. Focus on the mathematical or algorithmic core rather than repeating the full statement.

\section*{Key Observations}

\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*]
    \item Write the structural observations that make the problem tractable.
    \item State any useful invariant, monotonicity property, graph interpretation, or combinatorial reformulation.
    \item If the constraints matter, explain exactly which part of the solution they enable.
\end{itemize}

\section*{Algorithm}

\begin{enumerate}[leftmargin=*]
    \item Describe the data structures and the state maintained by the algorithm.
    \item Explain the processing order and why it is sufficient.
    \item Mention corner cases explicitly if they affect the implementation.
\end{enumerate}

\section*{Correctness Proof}

We prove that the algorithm returns the correct answer.

\paragraph{Lemma 1.}
State the first key claim.

\paragraph{Proof.}
Provide a concise proof.

\paragraph{Lemma 2.}
State the next claim if needed.

\paragraph{Proof.}
Provide a concise proof.

\paragraph{Theorem.}
The algorithm outputs the correct answer for every valid input.

\paragraph{Proof.}
Combine the lemmas and finish the argument.

\section*{Complexity Analysis}

State the running time and memory usage in terms of the input size.

\section*{Implementation Notes}

\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*]
    \item Mention any non-obvious implementation detail that is easy to get wrong.
    \item Mention numeric limits, indexing conventions, or tie-breaking rules if relevant.
\end{itemize}

\end{document}