All ICPC entries
Competitive Programming

ICPC 2017 - H. Scenery

State the problem in your own words. Focus on the mathematical or algorithmic core rather than repeating the full statement.

Source sync Apr 19, 2026
Track ICPC
Year 2017
Files TeX, C++, statement assets
Folder competitive_programming/icpc/2017/H-scenery
ICPC2017TeXC++statement textstatement pdf

Source-first archive entry

This page is built from the copied files in competitive_programming/icpc/2017/H-scenery. Edit competitive_programming/icpc/2017/H-scenery/solution.tex to update the written solution and competitive_programming/icpc/2017/H-scenery/solution.cpp to update the implementation.

The website does not replace those files with hand-maintained HTML. It reads the copied source tree during the build and exposes the exact files below.

Problem Statement

Copied statement text kept beside the solution archive for direct reference.

Rapid City

                                                                                                   event
                                                                                                   sponsor
                                                                                                             ICPC 2017

                                               Problem H
                                                     Scenery
                                       Time limit: 6 seconds

                                    Images by John Fowler, Carol Highsmith, and Richard Woodland

You have decided to spend a day of your trip to Rapid City taking photographs of the South Dakota Badlands,
which are renowned for their spectacular and unusual land formations. You are an amateur photographer,
yet very particular about lighting conditions.
After some careful research, you have located a beautiful location in the Badlands, surrounded by pic-
turesque landscapes. You have determined a variety of features that you wish to photograph from this
location. For each feature you have identified the earliest and latest time of day at which the position of
the sun is ideal. However, it will take quite a bit of time to take each photograph, given the need to repo-
sition the tripod and camera and your general perfectionism. So you are wondering if it will be possible to
successfully take photographs of all these features in one day.

Input

The first line of the input contains two integers n (1 ≤ n ≤ 104 ) and t (1 ≤ t ≤ 105 ), where n is the number
of desired photographs and t is the time you spend to take each photograph. Following that are n additional
lines, each describing the available time period for one of the photographs. Each such line contains two
nonnegative integers a and b, where a is the earliest time that you may begin working on that photograph,
and b is the time by which the photograph must be completed, with a + t ≤ b ≤ 109 .

Output

Display yes if it is possible to take all n photographs, and no otherwise.

                                                                               Rapid City

                                                                  event
                                                                  sponsor
                                                                            ICPC 2017

Sample Input 1                                  Sample Output 1
2 10                                            yes
0 15
5 20

Sample Input 2                                  Sample Output 2
2 10                                            no
1 15
0 20

Sample Input 3                                  Sample Output 3
2 10                                            yes
5 30
10 20

Editorial

Rendered from the copied solution.tex file. The original TeX source remains available below.

Key Observations

  • Write the structural observations that make the problem tractable.

  • State any useful invariant, monotonicity property, graph interpretation, or combinatorial reformulation.

  • If the constraints matter, explain exactly which part of the solution they enable.

Algorithm

  1. Describe the data structures and the state maintained by the algorithm.

  2. Explain the processing order and why it is sufficient.

  3. Mention corner cases explicitly if they affect the implementation.

Correctness Proof

We prove that the algorithm returns the correct answer.

Lemma 1.

State the first key claim.

Proof.

Provide a concise proof.

Lemma 2.

State the next claim if needed.

Proof.

Provide a concise proof.

Theorem.

The algorithm outputs the correct answer for every valid input.

Proof.

Combine the lemmas and finish the argument.

Complexity Analysis

State the running time and memory usage in terms of the input size.

Implementation Notes

  • Mention any non-obvious implementation detail that is easy to get wrong.

  • Mention numeric limits, indexing conventions, or tie-breaking rules if relevant.

Code

Exact copied C++ implementation from solution.cpp.

C++ competitive_programming/icpc/2017/H-scenery/solution.cpp

Exact copied implementation source.

Raw file
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;

namespace {

void solve() {
    // Fill in the full solution logic for the problem here.
}

}  // namespace

int main() {
    ios::sync_with_stdio(false);
    cin.tie(nullptr);

    solve();
    return 0;
}

Source Files

Exact copied source-of-truth files. Edit solution.tex for the write-up and solution.cpp for the implementation.

TeX write-up competitive_programming/icpc/2017/H-scenery/solution.tex

Exact copied write-up source.

Raw file
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm}
\usepackage{enumitem}

\title{ICPC World Finals 2017\\H. Scenery}
\author{}
\date{}

\begin{document}
\maketitle

\section*{Problem Summary}

State the problem in your own words. Focus on the mathematical or algorithmic core rather than repeating the full statement.

\section*{Key Observations}

\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*]
    \item Write the structural observations that make the problem tractable.
    \item State any useful invariant, monotonicity property, graph interpretation, or combinatorial reformulation.
    \item If the constraints matter, explain exactly which part of the solution they enable.
\end{itemize}

\section*{Algorithm}

\begin{enumerate}[leftmargin=*]
    \item Describe the data structures and the state maintained by the algorithm.
    \item Explain the processing order and why it is sufficient.
    \item Mention corner cases explicitly if they affect the implementation.
\end{enumerate}

\section*{Correctness Proof}

We prove that the algorithm returns the correct answer.

\paragraph{Lemma 1.}
State the first key claim.

\paragraph{Proof.}
Provide a concise proof.

\paragraph{Lemma 2.}
State the next claim if needed.

\paragraph{Proof.}
Provide a concise proof.

\paragraph{Theorem.}
The algorithm outputs the correct answer for every valid input.

\paragraph{Proof.}
Combine the lemmas and finish the argument.

\section*{Complexity Analysis}

State the running time and memory usage in terms of the input size.

\section*{Implementation Notes}

\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*]
    \item Mention any non-obvious implementation detail that is easy to get wrong.
    \item Mention numeric limits, indexing conventions, or tie-breaking rules if relevant.
\end{itemize}

\end{document}