ICPC 2016
ICPC 2016

D. Clock Breaking

After numerous unfortunate freak fatalities and the lawsuits, settlements, protests, and boycotts that naturally followed, the beleaguered executives at ACME Clock Manufacturers have decided they need to finally fix their disastrous quality control issues....

Updated May 21, 2026
Track ICPC
Year 2016
Statement Text + PDF
TeXC++Statement textStatement PDF

Problem Statement

Formatted from the contest statement text, with sample tests broken out into copyable blocks.

Time limit 5 seconds

After numerous unfortunate freak fatalities and the lawsuits, settlements, protests, and boycotts that naturally followed, the beleaguered executives at ACME Clock Manufacturers have decided they need to finally fix their disastrous quality control issues. It has been known for years that the digital clocks they manufacture have an unacceptably high ratio of faulty liquid-crystal display (LCD) screens, and yet these heartless souls have repeatedly failed to address the issue, or even warn their hapless consumers! You have been called in as a quality consultant to finally put a stop to the madness. Your job is to write an automated program that can test a clock and find faults in its display. These clocks use a standard 7-segment LCD display for all digits (shown on the left in Figure D.1), plus two small segments for the ‘:’, and show all times in a 24-hour format. The minute before midnight is 23:59, and midnight is 0:00. The ‘:’ segments of a working clock are on at all times. The representation of each digit using the seven segments is shown on the right in Figure D.1.

Figure D.1: LCD display of each digit.

Your program will be given the display of a clock at several consecutive minutes, although you do not know exactly what time these displays start. Some of the LCD segments are burnt out (permanently off) and some are burnt in (permanently on). Your program must determine, where possible, which segments are definitely malfunctioning and which are definitely in working order.

Input

The first input line contains a single integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 100), which is the number of consecutive minutes of a clock’s display. The next 8n − 1 lines contain n ASCII images of these clock displays of size 7 × 21, with a single blank line separating the representations. All digit segments are represented by two characters, and each colon segment is represented by one character. The character ‘X’ indicates a segment that is on. The character ‘.’ indicates anything else (segments that are off or non-segment portions of the display). See the sample input/output for details; the first output shows every possible LCD segment along with the smaller segments used to represent the ‘:’. No clock representation has an ‘X’ in a non-segment position or only half of a segment showing.

Output

Display a 7 × 21 ASCII image with a ‘0’ for every segment that is burnt out, a ‘1’ for every segment that is burnt in, a ‘W’ for every segment that is definitely working, and a ‘?’ for every segment for which the status cannot be determined. Use ‘.’ for non-segments. If the given displays cannot come from consecutive minutes, display impossible.

Sample Tests

Sample 1
Sample Input
3
......XX.....XX...XX.
.....X..X...X..X....X
.....X..X.X.X..X....X
.............XX...XX.
.....X..X......X.X..X
.....X..X......X.X..X
......XX.....XX...XX.

......XX.....XX...XX.
.....X..X...X..X....X
.....X..X.X.X..X....X
.............XX...XX.
.....X..X......X.X..X
.....X..X......X.X..X
......XX.....XX...XX.

.............XX...XX.
........X...X..X....X
........X.X.X..X....X
.............XX......
........X...X..X.X..X
........X...X..X.X..X
......XX.....XX...XX.
Sample Output
.??...WW.....??...??.
?..?.W..?...?..1.0..?
?..?.W..?.?.?..1.0..?
.??...??.....11...WW.
?..?.W..?.0.W..?.1..?
?..?.W..?...W..?.1..?
.??...11.....??...??.
Sample 2
Sample Input
2
......XX.....XX...XX.
...X....X...X..X.X..X
...X....X.X.X..X.X..X
......XX..........XX.
...X.X....X.X..X.X..X
...X.X......X..X.X..X
......XX.....XX...XX.

......XX.....XX......
...X....X...X..X.....
...X....X.X.X..X.....
......XX.............
...X.X....X.X..X.....
...X.X......X..X.....
......XX.....XX......
Sample Output
impossible

Editorial

The solution write-up is rendered from the LaTeX source, with equations kept live through MathJax.

Key Observations

  • Write the structural observations that make the problem tractable.

  • State any useful invariant, monotonicity property, graph interpretation, or combinatorial reformulation.

  • If the constraints matter, explain exactly which part of the solution they enable.

Algorithm

  1. Describe the data structures and the state maintained by the algorithm.

  2. Explain the processing order and why it is sufficient.

  3. Mention corner cases explicitly if they affect the implementation.

Correctness Proof

We prove that the algorithm returns the correct answer.

Lemma 1.

State the first key claim.

Proof.

Provide a concise proof.

Lemma 2.

State the next claim if needed.

Proof.

Provide a concise proof.

Theorem.

The algorithm outputs the correct answer for every valid input.

Proof.

Combine the lemmas and finish the argument.

Complexity Analysis

State the running time and memory usage in terms of the input size.

Implementation Notes

  • Mention any non-obvious implementation detail that is easy to get wrong.

  • Mention numeric limits, indexing conventions, or tie-breaking rules if relevant.

Code

C++ solution used for this page.

C++

Clean code view with a raw-file link when you want the original source.

Raw file
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;

namespace {

void solve() {
    // Fill in the full solution logic for the problem here.
}

}  // namespace

int main() {
    ios::sync_with_stdio(false);
    cin.tie(nullptr);

    solve();
    return 0;
}

Source Files and Assets

Raw files are still available here when you want the original TeX, C++, or statement assets.

Show raw files