All ICPC entries
Competitive Programming

ICPC 2010 - G. The Islands

State the problem in your own words. Focus on the mathematical or algorithmic core rather than repeating the full statement.

Source sync Apr 19, 2026
Track ICPC
Year 2010
Files TeX, C++, statement assets
Folder competitive_programming/icpc/2010/G-the-islands
ICPC2010TeXC++statement textstatement pdf

Source-first archive entry

This page is built from the copied files in competitive_programming/icpc/2010/G-the-islands. Edit competitive_programming/icpc/2010/G-the-islands/solution.tex to update the written solution and competitive_programming/icpc/2010/G-the-islands/solution.cpp to update the implementation.

The website does not replace those files with hand-maintained HTML. It reads the copied source tree during the build and exposes the exact files below.

Problem Statement

Copied statement text kept beside the solution archive for direct reference.

Problem G
                                               The Islands
                                           Problem ID: islands
Wen Chen is the captain of a rescue boat. One of his important tasks is to visit a group of islands once a day to
check if everything is all right. Captain Wen starts
from the west-most island, makes a pass to the
east-most island visiting some of the islands, then
makes a second pass from the east-most island
back to the first one visiting the remaining
islands. In each pass Captain Wen moves steadily
east (in the first pass) or west (in the second pass),
but moves as far north or south as he needs to
reach the islands. The only complication is that
there are two special islands where Wen gets fuel
for his boat, so he must visit them in separate
passes. Figure 7 shows the two special islands in
pink (1 and 3) and one possible path Captain Wen
could take.

Calculate the length of the shortest path to visit all
                                                                                  Figure 7
the islands in two passes when each island’s
location and the identification of the two special islands are given.

Input
The input consists of multiple test cases. The data for each case begins with a line containing 3 integers n
(4 ≤ n ≤ 100), b1, and b2 (0 < b1, b2 < n-1 and b1 ≠ b2), where n is the number of islands (numbered 0 to n-1) and
b1 and b2 are the two special islands. Following this, there are n lines containing the integer x- and y-coordinates
of each island (0 ≤ x, y ≤ 2000), starting with island 0. No two islands have the same x-coordinate and they are
in order from west-most to east-most (that is, minimum x-coordinate to maximum x-coordinate).

Input for the last case is followed by a line containing 3 zeroes.

Output
For each case, display two lines. The first line contains the case number and the length of the shortest tour
Captain Wen can take to visit all the islands, rounded and displayed to the nearest hundredth. The second line
contains a space-separated list of the islands in the order that they should be visited, starting with island 0 and 1,
and ending with island 0. Each test case will have a unique solution. Follow the format in the sample output.

Sample Input                                                 Output for the Sample Input
5 1 3                                                        Case 1: 18.18
1 3                                                          0 1 4 3 2 0
3 4                                                          Case 2: 24.30
4 1                                                          0 1 3 4 2 0
7 5
8 3
5 3 2
0 10
3 14
4 7
7 10
8 12
0 0 0

This page intentionally left blank.

Editorial

Rendered from the copied solution.tex file. The original TeX source remains available below.

Key Observations

  • Write the structural observations that make the problem tractable.

  • State any useful invariant, monotonicity property, graph interpretation, or combinatorial reformulation.

  • If the constraints matter, explain exactly which part of the solution they enable.

Algorithm

  1. Describe the data structures and the state maintained by the algorithm.

  2. Explain the processing order and why it is sufficient.

  3. Mention corner cases explicitly if they affect the implementation.

Correctness Proof

We prove that the algorithm returns the correct answer.

Lemma 1.

State the first key claim.

Proof.

Provide a concise proof.

Lemma 2.

State the next claim if needed.

Proof.

Provide a concise proof.

Theorem.

The algorithm outputs the correct answer for every valid input.

Proof.

Combine the lemmas and finish the argument.

Complexity Analysis

State the running time and memory usage in terms of the input size.

Implementation Notes

  • Mention any non-obvious implementation detail that is easy to get wrong.

  • Mention numeric limits, indexing conventions, or tie-breaking rules if relevant.

Code

Exact copied C++ implementation from solution.cpp.

C++ competitive_programming/icpc/2010/G-the-islands/solution.cpp

Exact copied implementation source.

Raw file
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;

namespace {

void solve() {
    // Fill in the full solution logic for the problem here.
}

}  // namespace

int main() {
    ios::sync_with_stdio(false);
    cin.tie(nullptr);

    solve();
    return 0;
}

Source Files

Exact copied source-of-truth files. Edit solution.tex for the write-up and solution.cpp for the implementation.

TeX write-up competitive_programming/icpc/2010/G-the-islands/solution.tex

Exact copied write-up source.

Raw file
\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage[margin=1in]{geometry}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsthm}
\usepackage{enumitem}

\title{ICPC World Finals 2010\\G. The Islands}
\author{}
\date{}

\begin{document}
\maketitle

\section*{Problem Summary}

State the problem in your own words. Focus on the mathematical or algorithmic core rather than repeating the full statement.

\section*{Key Observations}

\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*]
    \item Write the structural observations that make the problem tractable.
    \item State any useful invariant, monotonicity property, graph interpretation, or combinatorial reformulation.
    \item If the constraints matter, explain exactly which part of the solution they enable.
\end{itemize}

\section*{Algorithm}

\begin{enumerate}[leftmargin=*]
    \item Describe the data structures and the state maintained by the algorithm.
    \item Explain the processing order and why it is sufficient.
    \item Mention corner cases explicitly if they affect the implementation.
\end{enumerate}

\section*{Correctness Proof}

We prove that the algorithm returns the correct answer.

\paragraph{Lemma 1.}
State the first key claim.

\paragraph{Proof.}
Provide a concise proof.

\paragraph{Lemma 2.}
State the next claim if needed.

\paragraph{Proof.}
Provide a concise proof.

\paragraph{Theorem.}
The algorithm outputs the correct answer for every valid input.

\paragraph{Proof.}
Combine the lemmas and finish the argument.

\section*{Complexity Analysis}

State the running time and memory usage in terms of the input size.

\section*{Implementation Notes}

\begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*]
    \item Mention any non-obvious implementation detail that is easy to get wrong.
    \item Mention numeric limits, indexing conventions, or tie-breaking rules if relevant.
\end{itemize}

\end{document}